Doubles

Civilian Post #: 815 Age: 19 Location: Pampa, TX

yeah i know we have a match this weekend, but does anyone want to do a double match?

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:02 pm

AMW* may be up for a possible challenge on Monday.

~Goodz~

_________________

"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:16 pm

hmmm... who is this AMW* ????

_________________

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:39 pm

tuffmuff wrote:

hmmm... who is this AMW* ????

America's Most Wanted*. We're 0-1, against the "so-called" #1 ranked team over all (BTW a re-match, will definitely be taking place), and are very upset and ready to unleash fury & havoc on any willing ~~victims~~...I mean participants.

~Goodz~

_________________

"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:03 pm

LOL good stuff. I think Gar and I are like.... 2-7 or something. Its interesting. The strategy is so different. I've been real busy in the afternoons we haven't had a match in a while.

_________________

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:12 pm

"Strategy" is so misconceived in these battles, opposed to how u would approach a real battle. I see alot of cheesing. In the Hero battle (which was my fault for scheduling AGAIN)...they just stayed on the other side (Island Outpost, Standoff) and hid. If you ran towards the warhawk...they bino'd it. If you came up the back side of the heel..bino'd. They tried to avoid as much confrontation as they could. They would hide back by the bunkers surrounded in black magic. They hardly ever used their Warhawk....and NEVER tried to attack our side. LAME

~Goodz~

_________________

"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."

Subject: Re: Doubles Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:54 pm

Hmmm interesting. Every team we've played has been aggressive as hell. Those top teams are hilarious though. I don't think any of them have played each other.

_________________

Subject: Re: Doubles Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:30 am

tuffmuff wrote:

Hmmm interesting. Every team we've played has been aggressive as hell. Those top teams are hilarious though. I don't think any of them have played each other.

That's one of the main things I hate about GB's. That's what I was saying as for clan battles. The so called "Top" teams rarely play each other to protect their records, and to sure a spot in the playoffs. So they prey on Noob clans, are clans that aren't considered top tier. You would think that you would want to play the top teams in order to see what they have and what they need to work on, but they view it as, they don't want anything as in weaknesses, to get out.

That 2 on 2 team, for them to be #1 over all.... I wasn't impressed to the least bit.

~Goodz~

_________________

"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."

Subject: Re: Doubles Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:28 pm

Cowardice. Its a plague.

_________________

Subject: Re: Doubles Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:53 am

i agree.

Standing

garwar

Subject: Re: Doubles Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:34 am

I've never done this before and I need a partner, anyone wanna team up?

» 8 - Ball Doubles Championship: Rules
» Doubles hail team
» Little Cup Doubles Team (Un-completed)
» RMT Doubles Plz (Tough Critisism Is Wanted)
» Gun Doubles Wk Corner Strike

Doubles

Doubles

Similar topics

Similar topics