Post #: 1744 Age: 31 Location: Westcheddar, NY Status: "Amateurs talk strategy. PROFESSIONALS talk logistics."
Subject: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:27 am
For the most part I agree with these, I'd bump up a few though. IMO Lord of the Rings is the best trilogy ever, due to it's consistency. Whether they're the best movies (IMO only Star Wars is better) is up for debate. But it's no denying as a whole they're the best. I WOULD say SW, but the changes George Lucas made to ROTJ water the movie down a little.
Post #: 2923 Age: 34 Location: Dolla$,TX Status: Mvmt Mogul
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:42 pm
prboi400 wrote:
X3 was the shit!
I thought the same thing...I certain Almighty one, thought otherwise. - FAIL
~Goodz~
_________________
"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."
Post #: 2923 Age: 34 Location: Dolla$,TX Status: Mvmt Mogul
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:44 pm
The Rocky one is innacurate IMO.
~Goodz~
_________________
"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."
Post #: 1744 Age: 31 Location: Westcheddar, NY Status: "Amateurs talk strategy. PROFESSIONALS talk logistics."
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:44 pm
Quote:
X3 was the shit!
Damn PR, I've never had to cancel you before man. I'm hate to do it being that your one of the most reasonable guys in the clan. Good and Muffy said the same thing and I'm wondering, WHAT THE F WERE YA'LL WATCHING?! X3 makes a great coaster or frisbee though.
See, the studio wanted to rush movie out a year early and went with a sloppy script, the acting a special effects and action was great as usual. But the story was trash and a lame way to end the trilogy.
Quote:
The Rocky one is innacurate IMO.
A few are a bit off, but I think they're right for the most part. Yeah your right for a change, I'd definetly put 2 and 3 higher, especially 2, which is the best IMO.
Post #: 2923 Age: 34 Location: Dolla$,TX Status: Mvmt Mogul
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:02 pm
TonyAlmighty wrote:
A few are a bit off, but I think they're right for the most part. Yeah your right for a change, I'd definetly put 2 and 3 higher, especially 2, which is the best IMO.
Did you catch the last one? It's reminiscent of 1...I thought that one was just as good as 1,2.
~Goodz~
_________________
"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."
Post #: 1744 Age: 31 Location: Westcheddar, NY Status: "Amateurs talk strategy. PROFESSIONALS talk logistics."
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:09 pm
Quote:
A few are a bit off, but I think they're right for the most part. Yeah your right for a change, I'd definetly put 2 and 3 higher, especially 2, which is the best IMO.
Yeah I did, I just did'nt say anything about 4 and 5 cause the guy who made this was dealing in three's. Yeah 5 was a GREAT movie, b*tch ass Tarver messed it up for me a little though ( I gotta hold down Roy). They should've just went with LL like they said they would. But after Tarver caught Roy and was hot for a minute Sly wanted him.
Post #: 2923 Age: 34 Location: Dolla$,TX Status: Mvmt Mogul
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:28 pm
Yeah...Tarver is one of those Boxer's I just don't understand. He had Roy's number, but for anyone else with descent skills that he stepped in the ring with, he threw his skirt up.
~Goodz~
_________________
"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."
Post #: 1744 Age: 31 Location: Westcheddar, NY Status: "Amateurs talk strategy. PROFESSIONALS talk logistics."
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:52 pm
Quote:
Yeah...Tarver is one of those Boxer's I just don't understand. He had Roy's number, but for anyone else with descent skills that he stepped in the ring with, he threw his skirt up.
I mean Tarver is one of the FEW guys that could beat Roy, it ALWAYS gonna happen. No one made Frazier look as good as Ali who was the greatest, if not top 3 in EVERYONE’S list. That’s why I’m mad b*tch ass Mayweather “retired”, he knew all the talent was in his new division and he took the money and ran. Tarver NEVER showed me anything, he’s a chump who got cute off of beating one of the goats, but never did anything after that!!!
My dude, Roy loosing is in my top five sport disappointments of all time!!! Till this day I can’t watch any of this loses a second time. It took me a minute to get over it and come to grips with it!! Roy is my favorite boxer man, the dude performed Magic in the ring!
Post #: 2923 Age: 34 Location: Dolla$,TX Status: Mvmt Mogul
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
TonyAlmighty wrote:
That’s why I’m mad b*tch ass Mayweather “retired”, he knew all the talent was in his new division and he took the money and ran. Tarver NEVER showed me anything, he’s a chump who got cute off of beating one of the goats, but never did anything after that!!! !
I've been saying that, but a couple of my potnas aren't trying to hear it. It appears he's just going to sit back, and watch everyone kill each other, and then come forth and say I want the last man standing. Kinda cowardly IMO if you ask me. I think he's trying to protect his legacy, and this is much more different than when Lennox laid it down. Lennox, trully was at the top of his class, either beat or revenged his defeats, and there was no one else left to fight or to prove. Floyd for some reason doesn't want to see Cotto, Margarito (which probably won't happen now), Definitely Mosely, he's been avoiding him for the longest, and Pac Man. Watch...he'll step up if Pac Man beats Hatton. Prove you're the best of your era as you self proclaim...there shouldnt be any thought out there.
TonyAlmighty wrote:
My dude, Roy loosing is in my top five sport disappointments of all time!!! Till this day I can’t watch any of this loses a second time. It took me a minute to get over it and come to grips with it!! Roy is my favorite boxer man, the dude performed Magic in the ring!
To me...Roy was just never the same after the Tarver dismays. He was downhill from there, and just didnt seem to have the same swagger or confidence. In his pinnacle...he was up there with some of the best to watch as for entertainment. He and Iron Mike lead the list of all time dissapointments.
~Goodz~
_________________
"That's exactly what you have... thanks, but no thanks. Why would I want to be apart of a "CLAN", when I'm involved in a Network? This is The Movement...."
Post #: 1744 Age: 31 Location: Westcheddar, NY Status: "Amateurs talk strategy. PROFESSIONALS talk logistics."
Subject: Re: The Trilogy Meter Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:33 pm
Quote:
To me...Roy was just never the same after the Tarver dismays. He was downhill from there, and just didnt seem to have the same swagger or confidence. In his pinnacle...he was up there with some of the best to watch as for entertainment. He and Iron Mike lead the list of all time dissapointments.
Roy's problem was that he lost LATE in his career and didn't know how to handle it. His physical skills were still intact, it was all mental. Now had this happen when he was younger, he would've bounced back brand new. I clearly remeber Roy saying right before the first one with Tarver that after he wins, he wanted to go up to fight heavy and fight Mike (who was still boxing at the time).
Don't get me started on Iron Mike, 9 year old Lil Anthony cried when he lost!! All Mike needed was guidance man, after Cus D'mato died he had no one but his goons and you see how fast and hard he fell!!! People laugh now, but Mike was THAT good when he had Cus man!!!
![[Mvmt] - The Movement Online Gaming Network*](http://i47.servimg.com/u/f47/12/67/69/06/site-b11.png)
